Skip to content
Digital Memory Storage

Digital Memory Storage

Project of the Scientific Archive of the IA NASU

  • Home
  • About Petrov
    • Viktor Petrov and his Archive
    • Works By Viktor Petrov (Domontovych)
    • Works about Viktor Petrov (Domontovych)
    • Description of the collection
  • The Project
    • About the work on the Project
    • Souvenir calendar for 2025
  • The Archive
    • History of the Archive
    • Archival Funds
    • Activities
    • Partnerships
    • Students in the Archive
  • Categories
    • About Viktor Petrov (Domontovych)
      • Biographic documents
      • Portraits and other photographs
      • Case on the defence of the dissertation
    • Archaeology
      • “Urnfield culture”
      • Kosanove grave field
      • Negatives on glass
      • Tyras and previously unknown photos of Viktor Petrov
      • Research of Kyiv
      • Ceramics and ceramic production
    • History, folkloristics and linguistics
      • Feudalism in Kyivan Rus’
      • Folkloristics
      • Old Prussian grammar
      • The peoples colonised by Russia
    • Literature studies and literature
      • Studies on Panteleimon Kulish
      • Studies on Hohol (Gogol) and “The Girl with a Teddy Bear”
      • Literary fragments about Shchors
    • Epistolary heritage
      • Letters from Oleksandr Bodianskii
      • Letters from fellow female archivists Nadiia Linka and Serafima Kuznetsova
      • Letters from Fedot Filin
  • UA

Category: Feudalism in Kyivan Rus’

VIKTOR PETROV ON THE PROBLEM OF FEUDALISM IN KYIVAN RUS’

Box 258 from the personal collection of Viktor Petrov (No. 16) in the Research Archives of the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine contains an unpublished typewriting with no title that deals with the problem of feudalism in Kyivan Rus’. According to the dates of publication of the studies cited there, Petrov completed this text no earlier than 1956, when he moved from Moscow to Kyiv for permanent residence and began working at the Institute of Archaeology of the Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR. It consists of two chapters and five subchapters:

Chapter I. “Development of production in the second half of the first millennium AD”:

– “Agriculture and wildcrafting”;
– “Crafts and trade”;

Chapter II. “Development of social relations in the second half of the first millennium AD”:

– “Decay of the primal society”;
– “Formation of the feudal society”;
– “Establishment of the Kyivan Rus’”.

The text presents the Marxist view of historical development, which is based on the mandatory transition of all societies through five successive economic stages called formations. Despite the ideological framework, what is valuable in this study is the systematization of the most recent results of archaeological excavations of settlements and burial grounds from the period that preceded or coincided with the beginnings of Kyivan Rus’. Petrov emphasized in the text the importance of archaeological sources, given the lack of written information from this period. In the text, the researcher mainly focused on the analysis of the artefacts of the Chernyakhiv and Zarubynets cultures, which Petrov personally studied in the 1950s as a member of a number of expeditions to the Ukrainian and Moldovan SSR. According to researcher Vitalii Andrieiev:

“At this time, the problem of the origin of the Slavs came to the forefront of Soviet archaeology and history studies. A special place in the ethnogenesis of the Slavs was given to the Zarubynets and Chernyakhiv cultures. In this situation, the ideas expressed by Vikentii Khvojka in the early twentieth century about the autochthonous and Slavic affiliation of these cultures were reborn and gained great favour among Soviet researchers.”

Despite this tendency, Petrov was careful in his text writing about the ethnic origins of the representatives of both cultures, which he thought were linked. According to Petrov, the Slavic substrate can only partially explain their origins.

At that time, Petrov was about 60 years old, so given his age and health condition, he could have avoided going to the field. However, in a letter to Sofia Zerova, he wrote with the energy and zeal known only to true researchers:

“Of course, excavations are far from easy, and I understand this perfectly well. (…) But what is archaeology without them?”

References:

1. Віктор Петров. Листи до Софії Зерової. Упорядниця Вікторія Сергієнко, передмова Андрій Портнов. Київ, 2021.

2. Віталій Андрєєв. Віктор Петров. Нариси інтелектуальної біографії вченого. Дніпропетровськ, 2012.

Viktoriia Serhiienko

196. Review of the work of S. V. Yushkov ‘Essays on the history of the emergence and initial development of feudalism in Kyivan Rus’

by adminik

Read More…196. Review of the work of S. V. Yushkov ‘Essays on the history of the emergence and initial development of feudalism in Kyivan Rus’

258. Problems of the Genesis of Feudalism (Kyivan Rus’).

by adminik

Read More…258. Problems of the Genesis of Feudalism (Kyivan Rus’).

Digital copies of low-resolution archival materials are presented on the website for informational purposes. All rights of the images belong to the Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (hereinafter – the Institute).

If you are the copyright holder of any material reproduced on the website, please contact the Institute at the address provided on the website.

If you wish to reproduce, publish or otherwise make available, or use the materials presented on the website for commercial purposes, you must apply to the Institute for permission.

Contacts

arhiv.ia.nanu@gmail.com

Address: Volodymyra Ivasiuka av., 12, Kyiv, 04210, 1st floor
How to get:
From the Obolon metro station:
1. 15 minutes on foot.
2. By bus – No. 73 or No. 102 to the stop called «Institute of Hydrobiology»

  • facebook
  • instagram
  • telegram-xxl
All rights reserved. © 2025 Institute of Archaeology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine | Digital Memory Storage
Scroll Up
Scroll Up